Supreme Court Appears to Lean in Favor of Trump in Colorado Ballot Case

In a significant development, the U.S. Supreme Court seemed skeptical of states' authority to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the ballot using Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. This case, which is being closely watched, has the potential to impact Trump's presidential candidacy nationwide.

During the oral arguments, several justices expressed concerns about the power of individual states to decide who can run for president.

Justice Elena Kagan, appointed by former President Obama, questioned why a single state should have the authority to determine the presidential candidates for the entire country.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson also raised doubts about disqualifying the presidency under the 14th Amendment.

 
 

Chief Justice John Roberts highlighted the potential consequences of upholding the Colorado decision, suggesting that other states could follow suit and remove candidates from the ballot.

Justice Samuel Alito echoed these concerns, emphasizing the potential for an unmanageable situation if each state reaches its own conclusions.

Trump's lawyer, Jonathan Mitchell, argued against banning an "admitted insurrectionist" from the ballot, noting that Congress could vote to lift the disability after the election.

Mitchell also contended that the president is not considered an "officer of the United States," thereby rendering Section 3 of the 14th Amendment inapplicable. He further argued that the events of January 6 should be classified as a "riot" rather than an insurrection, aligning with the former president's legal team's central claim.

Jason Murray, the lawyer representing Colorado voters, countered Trump's arguments by asserting that the president is indeed considered an officer of the U.S. Murray stated that Trump is seeking a special exemption from Section 3 that would only apply to him and emphasized that Trump disqualified himself from the ballot.

After the oral arguments concluded, Trump spoke to the media expressing confidence in the strength of their arguments and left the final decision to the Supreme Court. He questioned the idea of disqualifying the leader in the polls and leaving it up to the Court to determine whether it was fair or not.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear Trump's appeal of the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling that he is ineligible for the ballot due to his involvement in the January 6 Capitol riot. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment states that individuals engaged in rebellion or insurrection against the U.S. should not hold office.

Challenges to Trump's eligibility under the 14th Amendment have been filed in multiple states.

READ MORE:

In addition to Colorado, Trump was also removed from the ballot in Maine, with the ruling on hold pending the Supreme Court's decision on the Colorado case. This case, along with other legal issues before the Court, will have significant implications for the former president and may impact the outcome of the 2024 election.

Given the urgency of the matter, the Supreme Court has agreed to expedite the consideration of this case, with both parties urging a swift resolution ahead of the March 5 primaries in Colorado and Maine. The Court's eventual ruling will shape the future of Trump's candidacy and set a precedent for the interpretation of the 14th Amendment in relation to presidential eligibility.

Are you enjoying THE LOBBY? Our stories are only possible because of generous contributions from our readers. Please consider chipping in today. Thank you!

Previous
Previous

Colorado Legislature Again Threatens Coloradans' Second Amendment Rights

Next
Next

PETA's Absurd Demands: Animal-Themed Amusement Park Carousels Under Attack