Colorado’s progressives are fast to push a multi-billion highspeed rail project through uncertain communities
Colorado's future of passenger rail service linking the mountains and Front Range has received a significant amount of new funding from the feds and state, but concerns are mounting over the Polis administration's heavy-handed push to deliver on his promise at all costs, including making significant changes to Environmental Act.
Governor Jared Polis, along with Colorado Department of Transportation Executive Director Shoshana Lew and Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration Amit Bose, recently held a discussion regarding the logistics and plans for the massive rail project. They emphasized the long-range potential benefits of increased jobs, tourism, ‘sustainability’, and ‘livability’ that the rail system might bring to the state.
Lew, a Polis appointee, highlighted the extensive planning, legislative and policy process necessary for transportation projects of this size, including compliance with environmental acts.
However, the recent federal funding has raised concerns that the Polis administration may be bypassing crucial environmental assessments in order to expedite the project. Critics argue that this approach undermines the careful consideration of potential environmental impacts and risks.
It also would bypass the necessary public comment that would be needed in any project, let alone one of this massive size and expense.
Colorado's multibillion-dollar plans for the Mountain Rail and Front Range Rail involve utilizing existing rail infrastructure and partnering with Amtrak, BNSF Railway, Pacific Railway, and the Regional Transportation District to incorporate passenger service.
Polis and the progressive hopes their huge undertaking will address issues such as housing costs, traffic congestion, and job creation, critics worry that the rush to implement the rail system may overlook the long-term consequences.
Furthermore, the Polis administration's eagerness to move forward with the rail project raises questions about the financial sustainability of the endeavor.
While the governor believes the rail system will attract millions of dollars in grants, critics argue that the funding may not be consistent or sufficient to support the project in the long run. This uncertainty could place an additional burden on taxpayers and potentially lead to higher costs and delays.
Despite the administration's seemingly unending optimism, concerns remain among local communities and environmental advocates.
The potential impact on wildlife habitats, scenic landscapes, and the overall ecological balance of the region cannot be ignored. Critics argue that a more measured and thoughtful approach is necessary to ensure that the rail project aligns with both the needs of the community and the preservation of Colorado's natural beauty.
READ MORE:
POLIS DISCUSSES AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND MORE IN RECENT INTERVIEW
COLORADO'S GOVERNOR WANTS PASSENGER RAIL VOTE AND MOUNTAIN TRAINS
While Colorado may serve as a trailblazer for passenger rail lines, as suggested by Amit Bose, opponents caution against rushing into a project without careful consideration of the potential consequences. They argue that the state should prioritize sustainability, reliability, and the well-being of its citizens over hasty implementation.
Governor Polis, Shoshana Lew, and Amit Bose have stated that the Mountain and Front Range Rails will be operational within the next 10-15 years.