A bill making its way to the Colorado state House Judiciary Committee has sparked heated debates over its potential impact on the Department of Corrections and the rights of a small, tiny minority.

The proposed legislation, known as HB 24-1071 or Tiara's Law, aims to simplify the process of legally changing names for convicted felons seeking gender affirming care while incarcerated. However, critics argue that this bill represents another costly layer of government intervention that prioritizes the needs of a select few over the interests of the incarcerated majority.

Under the current law, felons can change their names only for "good cause." HB 24-1071 seeks to expand the definition of "good cause" to include gender-affirming care. While the ultimate decision would still rest with a judge, the bill's supporters argue that this change is necessary to address the unique circumstances faced by transgender individuals within the criminal justice system.

State Representative Lorena Garcia, a Democrat representing District 35, is the sponsor of this controversial bill. Rep. Garcia claims that transgender people are disproportionately represented in the legal system, with a conviction rate that far exceeds their population percentage. According to her statements to 9News, approximately 17% of incarcerated individuals identify as transgender, while they make up only 4% of the population in Colorado.

PRIME SPONSORS

• Rep. Lorena García

Rep. Garcia argues that the bill is essential because many transgender individuals may not have had the opportunity to transition or change their names before entering the penal system. She believes that by making name changes more accessible, this legislation would positively impact their mental health and overall identity.

Proponents of HB 24-1071 assert that the bill does not introduce new rights but rather clarifies existing ones. They argue that it is crucial for the government to ensure that all individuals, regardless of their circumstances, have equal access to their rights.

READ MORE:

• LAWMAKERS PRESENT BILL TO GIVE PRISONERS THE RIGHT TO VOTE, IGNITING CONTROVERSY

• COLORADO HAS BEGUN HIRING INCARCERATED PROFESSORS TO TEACH INMATES

• COLORADO’S ATTORNEY GENERAL GRANTS $3.9M FOR OPIOID ABUSE TREATMENT IN PRISONS

• A FEDERAL JUDGE HAS DISMISSED A LAWSUIT FILED BY AN INMATE AGAINST TWO CORRECTIONS OFFICERS

However, critics of Tiara's Law raise concerns over the potential cost and bureaucratic burden it could impose on the Department of Corrections. They argue that the bill's focus on a small minority detracts from addressing more pressing issues within the criminal justice system. Skeptics question the necessity of allocating resources to facilitate name changes for a select few.

As HB 24-1071 heads to the state House Judiciary Committee on January 30, the debate surrounding Tiara's Law intensifies. Supporters continue to emphasize the importance of inclusivity and accessibility, while opponents voice concerns about government overreach and the allocation of taxpayer resources.