Critics are sounding the alarm over Colorado HB24-1004, also known as the “Ex-Offenders Practice in Regulated Occupations” bill, which Democrats hope will streamline the process for individuals with nonviolent criminal records to obtain professional licenses through the state.

The bill, which recently passed through the House Business Affairs and Labor Committee, has sparked controversy and raised questions about the potential implications of fast-tracking professional licenses for ex-offenders.

Under HB24-1004, a uniform process would be established to prevent the automatic denial of license applications based on criminal records.

PRIME SPONSORS

• Rep. Jennifer Bacon

• Rep. Shannon Bird

• Sen. James Coleman

Instead, state regulators would be required to consider each applicant's criminal history and current circumstances on a case-by-case basis. The bill's proponents argue that it aims to remove barriers for individuals with criminal records seeking to meet credential and licensing requirements for various professions regulated by the Department of Regulatory Agencies.

While proponents like Rep. Shannon Bird of Westminster emphasize the bill's focus on second chances and economic opportunities for ex-offenders, critics argue that it could undermine public confidence in licensed professionals in Colorado. The concern is that fast-tracking professional licenses for individuals with criminal records may compromise the integrity and credibility of regulated professions, ultimately risking public safety and security.

Professions regulated by the Division of Professions and Occupations under DORA include a wide range of fields such as addiction counselors, plumbers, electricians, construction workers, social workers, and healthcare professionals. The bill's sponsors, all Democrats, highlight the importance of providing opportunities for ex-offenders to reenter society and address the state's workforce shortage. However, concerns have been raised about potential consumer protection issues and increased costs for all applicants under the proposed legislation.

During a committee hearing, Sam Delp, director of the Division of Professions and Occupations, expressed reservations about the bill, citing potential cost implications and consumer protection concerns. While acknowledging that application denials due to criminal history are rare, Delp raised important questions about the overall impact of the bill on the licensing process and public safety.

With estimates suggesting a revenue boost for the state from application fees, the bill's financial implications are also under scrutiny.

READ MORE:

• COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS INVESTIGATOR CHARGED WITH FORGING OFFICIAL REPORT

• COLORADO DEMOCRATS PROPOSE "BILL OF RIGHTS" FOR JUVENILES ACCUSED OF A CRIME, SPARKING CONTROVERSY

• GOVERNOR POLIS GRANTS CLEMENCY TO MURDER CONVICT, SPARKS CONTROVERSY

• COLORADO HAS BEGUN HIRING INCARCERATED PROFESSORS TO TEACH INMATES

Current estimates show the program would bring about $170,000 in revenue to the state from application fees. DORA would need to spend about $155,000 on the first year of the program, and about $170,000 for the following year.

As the bill progresses through the appropriations process, its fate lies in the hands of the Democratic-controlled House and Senate. The potential ramifications of fast-tracking professional licenses for ex-offenders will continue to be a point of contention as the bill moves forward for further consideration and debate.